Konrad du Plessis 0ceceebba4 Fix: supervisor picker hid regular active users (only admins showed)
Reported: when creating a new team or project from the friendly UI
(/teams/new/ or /projects/new/), the Supervisor dropdown only lists
is_staff / is_superuser accounts. Users who should be eligible to
supervise (e.g. eendman, supervisor_smoke) are invisible in the
picker even though they are active.

Root cause:
core.forms._supervisor_user_queryset filtered to
  is_active=True AND (is_staff OR is_superuser OR groups__name='Work Logger')
That was strictly more restrictive than the app's own permission
helper is_supervisor(user) in views.py, which grants supervisor
powers to ANYONE assigned to a team/project (via the team.supervisor
FK or project.supervisors M2M), regardless of group membership.
On Konrad's dev DB that excluded 2 of 6 active users from the picker
(one in a custom group, one in no group) even though both were valid
supervisor candidates by the permission model.

Fix:
Queryset now returns every active user. The act of assigning a user
to a team/project is what confers supervisor-ness downstream, so
the picker no longer needs a pre-registered allow-list. Inactive
users (is_active=False) remain excluded — the one hard guardrail.

Docstring rewritten to explain the new behavior and why. Stale comment
in TeamForm.__init__ updated to match (the old comment still described
the pre-fix Work-Logger-group requirement).

Tests: 4 new regression tests in SupervisorPickerQuerysetTests:
  - regular active user is selectable (the core bug)
  - user in an unrelated group is selectable
  - inactive user is still excluded (guardrail)
  - admin is still selectable (no regression for prior use case)
All 28 tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-22 19:52:29 +02:00
..
2026-02-22 12:14:54 +00:00
2026-04-22 00:19:15 +02:00
2026-02-22 12:14:54 +00:00
2026-02-22 12:14:54 +00:00
2026-04-22 00:19:15 +02:00
2026-04-22 00:19:15 +02:00