polish: document team-filter Salary scoping; stricter report regression assertion

core/tests.py

@@ -3676,8 +3676,8 @@ class ManagerSalariedPayReportTests(TestCase):
         # WorkLog-derived figures must be IDENTICAL with a manager present.
         self.assertEqual(before.get('total_worker_days'),
                          after.get('total_worker_days'))
-        self.assertEqual(str(before.get('cost_per_project')),
-                         str(after.get('cost_per_project')))
+        self.assertEqual(before.get('cost_per_project'),
+                         after.get('cost_per_project'))
 
     def test_salaried_cost_by_project_exposed(self):
         mgr = Worker.objects.create(

core/views.py

@@ -2525,6 +2525,12 @@ def _build_report_context(start_date, end_date, project_ids=None, team_ids=None)
     # the project filter via the safe FK `project_id__in` subquery — no M2M
     # JOIN inflation, per the CLAUDE.md "M2M filter + aggregate inflation"
     # note). We do NOT add a chained `.filter().filter()` here.
+    #
+    # Under a team filter the upstream `adjustments` queryset is already
+    # scoped to workers on the selected teams (exactly like every other
+    # adjustment figure on this report) — so a manager who isn't on a
+    # filtered team won't appear here. That's intended and consistent with
+    # the report's existing adjustment scoping.
     salaried_rows = (
         adjustments.filter(type='Salary')
         .values('project__id', 'project__name')